Abortion Debate Revived (Press, 4 November 1989)

On 4 November 1989, a new bill aiming to amend the Contraception, Sterilisation and Abortion Act has sparked renewed debates around abortion in New Zealand, thrusting the issue back into parliamentary focus just ahead of the upcoming General Election. The bill, sponsored by the Minister of Health, Ms. Clark, aims to simplify the process for obtaining an abortion, although it does not change the legal grounds under which abortions can be granted. As the political landscape evolves, the bill's sponsors face challenges in framing the discussion as one centred on health and equity rather than reigniting moral debates about abortion. Throughout 1989, New Zealand’s Parliament has encountered numerous conscience issues, with topics ranging from alcohol laws to gambling regulations dominating the discourse. The abortion debate stands out for its complexity, primarily due to the legal status of the foetus and the societal implications surrounding it. The amendment proposes a new process for abortion approval, allowing two doctors to authorise an abortion as long as one is an obstetrician or gynaecologist. It also seeks to eliminate existing restrictions on providing contraceptive advice to those under 16. These changes were motivated by recommendations from the Abortion Supervisory Committee, which emphasised the need for better access and education to reduce unwanted pregnancies. The introduction of the bill comes amidst rising anti-abortion sentiments inspired by movements in the United States, where significant political efforts have been made to restrict abortion rights. Notably, while legal challenges to the Roe v. Wade decision have intensified, New Zealand’s approach displays a contrasting trajectory, aiming to broaden access rather than limit it. Opposition to the bill has surfaced forcefully, with anti-abortion activists suggesting that it could lead to abortion on demand, undermining existing restrictions. Critics within Parliament have expressed concern that the bill's provisions will allow women to seek out accommodating doctors, further complicating the debate. While Parliament has demonstrated caution with prior moral issues — such as the decision on the legal drinking age — the future of this bill remains uncertain. The recent first reading passed with a notable margin, indicating some support but revealing a split among members on the abortion-related implications. Some politicians acknowledge the social responsibility of ensuring equitable access to reproductive health services, as highlighted by supporters of the bill who argue that women in rural areas especially struggle to obtain necessary services. However, opponents maintain that legislative changes threaten to revive contentious moral arguments about abortion, an issue both politicians and the public may prefer to avoid. As the debate unfolds, the sponsors of the Contraception, Sterilisation and Abortion Amendment Bill will need to navigate a complex landscape of moral convictions, public sentiment, and health advocacy to secure its passage in the face of a highly polarised opinion on abortion rights in New Zealand.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand