This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Gay Men’s Club Gets Liquor Licence (Press, 8 June 1989)
On 8 June 1989, it was reported that the Dorian Society in Christchurch received a charter licence allowing them to sell liquor at their premises located on Lichfield Street. The decision was met with some objections, notably from Mr C. Lee, the society's immediate past president, as well as from the Christchurch Licensed Nightclub and Cabaret Association. Mr S. King, the current president of the society, testified that the organisation was initially created as a supportive environment for homosexual men, allowing them to connect without facing public ridicule. King, who took over the presidency following a vote of no confidence against Lee in July 1988, mentioned that the police were aware of the society's existence and, in his view, supported its objectives. He acknowledged that the Dorian Society had five past convictions under the Sale of Liquor Act but asserted that these were not due to an intentional disregard for the law. King believed that the society had acted responsibly, sought legal counsel, and worked closely with law enforcement. While the focus of the society was on providing a venue for homosexual individuals, King noted their involvement in broader community initiatives, such as establishing a Gay Information Centre and organising conferences. The hearing did, however, witness scrutiny regarding allegations of drug use on the premises. During cross-examination, Lee raised concerns about the suitability of the society's officers to hold a liquor licence, suggesting issues such as drug dealing, underage alcohol sales, and non-compliance with licensing hours. The commission chairman, Judge Gatley, stated that while Lee's views were important, they needed to be considered in the context of his removal from the presidency, suggesting possible bias. Judge Gatley concluded that the commission was obliged to respect the lack of objection from the Christchurch police, who had comprehensive knowledge of the society’s operations and previous legal troubles. He warned that if the charter were to be granted and not managed responsibly, the society would likely face opposition from the police when it came time to renew the licence. Additionally, the commission imposed a membership cap of 250 for the society.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand