Brain Claim Angers Dutch Homosexuals (Press, 6 May 1989)

On 6 May 1989, a report by Peter Spinks highlighted the controversy surrounding recent research conducted by Professor Swaab, a reputable neuro-scientist, addressing the neurological differences in homosexual men in relation to A.I.D.S. victims. The research, part of a broader investigation into the sexual differentiation of the human hypothalamus, provoked backlash from various groups, including the National A.I.D.S. Committee, Members of Parliament, and the Homostudies Department of Utrecht University. They expressed outrage over the use of deceased homosexual A.I.D.S. patients' brains in the study. Professor Swaab explained that the findings stemmed from extensive research that involved examining the brains of 15 homosexual A.I.D.S. victims, revealing an enlargement in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which plays a crucial role in regulating biological rhythms, including sleep patterns and sexual behaviour. This particular group of cells was found to be twice the size in homosexual males compared to a control group of 100 heterosexual individuals. Swaab's research contradicted existing theories that suggested male homosexuals had a female-type hypothalamus. He clarified that the observed size difference in brain structures was directly correlated with sexual orientation, not gender identity. However, he was careful to note that a correlation does not imply causation, stating that it cannot be definitively concluded that structural differences in the brain lead to homosexuality. Instead, he proposed the possibility that homosexual behaviour could influence the development of these brain structures. Importantly, Swaab ruled out the idea that A.I.D.S. was responsible for the observed brain differences, stating that only homosexuals showed the enlarged cell structures among the examined A.I.D.S. patients. He also suggested that sexual differentiation in the human brain might occur after birth, challenging the belief that this process takes place during mid-pregnancy. He argued that the interaction of various factors, ranging from social and environmental influences to medical practices and diet, contributes to the complex relationship between brain structure and sexual behaviour. Swaab expressed confusion over the negative reception of his findings within the gay community, asserting that the research should not be interpreted as discriminatory. He attributed the misunderstanding to a lack of knowledge about the complexities of neurobiological research. The study aimed to provide a deeper understanding of human sexual orientation rather than to belittle or stigmatise homosexuals. Overall, the report encapsulated the ongoing dialogue regarding the biological underpinnings of sexual orientation while reflecting the sensitivity surrounding the topic of homosexuality and scientific research in the late 1980s.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand