A.I.D.S.—an Epidemic Already, But How Big Will It... (Press, 27 February 1989)

In a report published on 27 February 1989, "The Economist" examined the A.I.D.S. epidemic in the United States, highlighting the potential for significant growth in the number of cases despite public complacency. Three years prior, there was widespread concern about the possibility of the disease spreading to the heterosexual community; however, that alarm has lessened, and the disease continues to primarily affect homosexual men and intravenous-drug users. The Centres for Disease Control estimates that 1 million to 1.5 million Americans are currently infected with the H.I.V. virus, a figure that has remained unchanged since 1986. Nonetheless, there is a troubling rise in A.I.D.S. fatalities, with predictions suggesting that deaths in 1991 could reach as many as 50,000, the equivalent of those lost in the entire Vietnam War. The potential future cases of A.I.D.S. in 1992 could multiply significantly, yet most new infections will be from individuals already living with H.I.V. This uncertainty about the future of the epidemic is compounded by the lack of accurate data regarding the number of H.I.V. carriers in the population. The National Research Council (N.R.C.) calls for thorough surveys to determine how many Americans are infected with the H.I.V. virus, as the current estimates are based on indirect methods. These methods include estimating the population of at-risk groups such as homosexuals and drug addicts and extrapolating from existing A.I.D.S. data. Estimates of infected individuals vary widely due to the complexities of understanding the virus's latency period and the evolving nature of the epidemic. One solution proposed by the N.R.C. is to conduct random population surveys to get more accurate data. Previous studies have failed to capture a representative sample because they often focused on hospital patients or other specific groups. An example of this was the C.D.C.'s attempt to collect blood samples from Washington, D.C. which faced political backlash. The C.D.C. has since shifted its focus to Pittsburgh, where it is currently surveying households. This randomised survey approach is crucial, as it aims to target groups where the virus is prevalent while still maintaining randomness. Despite the promising nature of such studies, challenges remain, including public hesitation to participate in testing and the possibility that those who refuse to take part may skew the results. Disparities in A.I.D.S. incidence rates were noted among racial groups, with black and Hispanic populations being disproportionately affected. The report highlighted that a notable percentage of cases within these communities were due to heterosexual transmission, particularly among those connected with drug use. In conclusion, the report underscores the urgent need for accurate data to understand and address the A.I.D.S. epidemic in the United States, indicating that while the disease primarily remains within certain demographics today, its reach could expand significantly in the future.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand