The Thinking Detective (Press, 17 September 1988)

In a feature published on 17 September 1988, Paul Ben-Itzak of Reuters highlights the intriguing life transition of Josiah Thompson, a San Francisco detective with a unique background in philosophy. Previously a professor at Haverford College in Pennsylvania, Thompson had an academic career that included writing three notable books, among them a biography of Soren Kierkegaard. In 1976, feeling stagnant in his life, Thompson sought a sabbatical in the tranquil town of Bolinas, California, intending to write about Nietzsche. However, his path shifted dramatically when he encountered Hal Lipset, a distinguished private eye in the San Francisco Bay area. This meeting led Thompson to take a surveillance position for $5 an hour, thrusting him into the world of private investigation, an experience he narrates in his recently published book, "Gumshoe: Reflections in a Private Eye." In this memoir, Thompson recounts various aspects of his new career, detailing investigations involving murders, kidnappings, drug cases, and blackmail, along with the less glamorous tasks that fill a detective's day. Despite his philosophical roots, Thompson quickly learned that detective work was much more grounded than he anticipated. His first assignment involved surveilling a union leader, which took an unexpectedly perilous turn when he discovered a bullet hole in the window of a cable company office. This moment underscored the seriousness of his new role, transforming the experience from a whimsical adventure into a reality fraught with danger. Over time, Thompson handled various cases, including one involving a businessman whose ex-lover threatened him with a palimony suit. However, a particularly defining moment in his career came when he was tasked with a kidnapping case that led him to India. There, he worked with an Indian detective to apprehend a man who had taken his daughter back to India following the couple's separation. This intense experience allowed Thompson to reflect on the emotional complexities of fatherhood and the ethical dilemmas he faced in his line of work. Thompson acknowledges that his philosophical training does not significantly aid him in the practical aspects of detective work. He states that logic and deduction are not particularly helpful, as cases do not function as neat puzzles. Instead, real detective work requires getting out into the field, stirring the pot, and gathering information through real-world engagement. In his current case, he is focused on proving a client’s innocence in a murder charge by critically analysing ignored witness reports, a task that he insists requires practical skills rather than philosophical insight. Thompson expresses that his primary goal is not merely to uncover who committed a crime but to ensure justice for his client, reflecting a deep concern for the individuals involved rather than an objective search for truth. His journey from academia to the gritty realities of private investigation represents a profound evolution, blending his intellectual background with the harsher truths of human nature and justice.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand