Anonymous Testing Tor A.i.d.s. In Australia? (Press, 4 June 1988)

On 4 June 1988, news emerged from Sydney regarding Australia’s upcoming implementation of a new national programme for anonymous A.I.D.S. testing. This initiative, anticipated to launch following the Federal Budget, is designed to conduct A.I.D.S. testing without individuals’ awareness through what is termed sentinel screening. Professor Tony Basten, an A.I.D.S. adviser to the Federal Government, indicated that this system would utilise blood samples collected for other medical reasons, such as during hospital admissions. Professor Basten reassured the public that this testing approach would not compromise patient confidentiality, as the tests would remain anonymous. He acknowledged the difficulty of obtaining informed consent given the severity of the A.I.D.S. epidemic, arguing that public health priorities must sometimes outweigh individual rights. He opined that concerning a lethal virus, finding an appropriate balance between individual rights and public health is essential. He cited that sentinel testing has been previously implemented in the United States and Britain, where it has proven effective. For instance, its introduction in Britain exposed the presence of HIV 2, a strain not yet detected in Australia. Professor Basten stressed that this method is neither novel nor insidious but is instead an accepted public health tool in other countries. The Federal Health Minister, Dr Neal Blewett, has approved funding for this scheme, which has been put forth by the Commonwealth A.I.D.S. Research Grants Committee. Professor Basten expressed the urgent need for such a system in Australia, highlighting that it would provide vital data on the actual number of people infected with the A.I.D.S. virus. Current estimates present a stark discrepancy: while official figures identify around 5,100 Australians as A.I.D.S. carriers, estimates from the World Health Organisation suggest the true number could be as high as 85,000. This gap in knowledge has significant implications for the Government’s ability to formulate effective strategies for managing the epidemic and for educational outreach. Presently, A.I.D.S. testing in Australia has been limited to cases where informed consent is obtained, except in certain circumstances, such as for transplant donors, where testing is mandatory. The introduction of anonymous testing is hoped to fill a crucial gap in understanding the spread of A.I.D.S. and support the development of targeted public health initiatives.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand