AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Abortion Review Opposed On Both Sides (Press, 25 July 1987)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Abortion Review Opposed On Both Sides (Press, 25 July 1987)

On 25 July 1987, a political discourse emerged within New Zealand's Parliament concerning proposed changes to abortion laws, drawing differing opinions from both National and Labour party members. The Labour Party's women's policy suggested a review of existing abortion laws should they be re-elected. This review was intended to address issues highlighted by the Abortion Supervisory Committee, advocating that all doctors be recognised as certifying consultants for abortion reviews. The current situation forces women in rural areas, like the West Coast, to travel to urban centres for abortions due to a shortage of willing certifying consultants. Mr Graeme Lee, the National Party spokesman on family affairs, opposed the review, arguing it could ultimately lead to "abortion on demand." He accused the Government and the Abortion Supervisory Committee of conspiring to facilitate this change. Conversely, Labour MP Allan Wallbank from Gisborne declared his intention to vote against any expansion of certifying consultants, articulating a strong personal stance against abortion. He indicated that any legislation compromising his views on abortion would be met with opposition, regardless of its source. Mr John Terris, representing Western Hutt for Labour, expressed a more tentative position, noting he would need to review any presented legislation before casting his vote, while also highlighting his history of opposing abortion-related measures. He reaffirmed that Labour's proposal for a review included a conscience vote, a critical aspect of the party's policy on the matter. Additionally, an unnamed Labour MP indicated that efforts to legislate further on abortion would need to be pursued as private member's bills, as this issue transcended party lines and was heavily grounded in individual conscience. Furthermore, Labour's women’s policy also addressed the reconsideration of anti-discrimination provisions that had been excluded from the Homosexual Law Reform Bill. It mentioned that a review of the Human Rights Commission Act aimed to eliminate discrimination based on various grounds, including sexual orientation. This discourse highlights the complexity and contentious nature of abortion legislation and associated rights in New Zealand's political landscape during this period.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:25th July 1987
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19870725_2_2.html