Action On A.i.d.s. (Press, 24 June 1987)

In a letter to the editor dated 17 June 1987, Julie Holden expresses strong opposition to Robert Koch's proposal for mandatory antibody testing for A.I.D.S. and the isolation of individuals who test positive. Holden argues that current testing practices predominantly involve self-selection among high-risk groups and that implementing compulsory testing would be both cost-ineffective and time-consuming. She believes that the prospect of isolation would deter individuals from getting tested, as they may wish to avoid potential punishment. She points out that not everyone who tests positive necessarily carries the live virus, challenging the justification for extreme measures like quarantine that infringe on personal liberty. Holden highlights the logistical challenges of enforcing such a quarantine, noting that there is no defined period of infectiousness for the virus, making it difficult to determine when or if an individual could be safely released back into society. Additionally, Holden warns that the community's sense of security could diminish current preventative measures, risking an increase in transmission if carriers avoid testing. She stresses that there is no evidence to suggest that H.I.V. can be transmitted through casual contact, thus deeming the idea of segregating carriers as impractical and excessively restrictive. Holden advocates for a more thoughtful and compassionate approach to managing the A.I.D.S. crisis rather than one based on fear and isolation.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand