Union Disappointed At Childcare Funding (Press, 12 March 1987)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Union Disappointed At Childcare Funding (Press, 12 March 1987)
On 12 March 1987, the Combined State Unions (C.S.U.) expressed disappointment that the New Zealand Government had not provided funding for community-based childcare centres, which they believed would significantly enhance equal employment opportunities and alleviate pressures faced by working families. The C.S.U. was presenting submissions on the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Bill, which allows both men and women to take unpaid leave to care for a newborn or adopted child, with a total leave duration of up to 12 months. In their submission, the C.S.U. highlighted that the lack of a government-funded childcare scheme would hinder the effective use of parental leave and employment protection provisions. They argued that adequate childcare services were essential to support working parents. The union expressed concern that the proposed length of parental leave—52 weeks—was insufficient and advocated for a more flexible system that would allow caregivers greater choice over when to take their leave. Additionally, the C.S.U. recommended reducing the qualifying period for parental leave from 12 months of continuous employment to just six months. They also emphasized that all employees qualifying as primary caregivers should be eligible for parental leave, as the current legislation excluded some employees. The unions pointed out that the needs of families, particularly within the Māori whanau context, were not adequately recognised in the bill. They noted that the proposed legislation discriminated against certain groups, including separated de facto couples, as well as homosexual and lesbian employees, who would not be entitled to parental leave under the current terms of the bill. This submission brought attention to the need for more inclusive and supportive measures to benefit all families within New Zealand.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand