A.i.d.s. Advertising Stirs Backlash Among... (Press, 7 January 1987)

In January 1987, a UK government campaign aimed at reducing the spread of the A.I.D.S. virus faced backlash from religious communities and conservative politicians. The initiative, introduced by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, invested £60 million in advertisements encouraging the public to limit their sexual partners and utilise condoms. This proactive approach emerged in response to alarming projections indicating that A.I.D.S. could claim up to 40,000 lives annually in Britain by the 1990s. The campaign's neutral stance regarding morality was overtly displayed by the BBC, which adopted the slogan “Play Safe” for a weeklong radio campaign featuring programmes and hourly bulletins. This initiative, however, incited significant criticism from religious leaders and right-wing figures who felt that A.I.D.S. should be addressed through a return to traditional moral values, as suggested by the Church of England’s Board for Social Responsibility. The statistics at that time noted around 600 reported A.I.D.S. victims in Britain, with 296 fatalities, and projections indicating 1,300 new cases in 1987, rising to 3,000 in 1988. One of the most vociferous critics was Chief Constable James Anderton of Manchester, who, while also a lay preacher, condemned the campaign’s approach to sexual behaviour. He characterised individuals at risk of A.I.D.S. as "degenerates" and questioned why homosexual practices were not actively scrutinised in society. His comments were supported by senior religious figures who argued for a messaging shift towards chastity over condom usage, with the Archbishop of York labelling sexual promiscuity as both morally and medically perilous. The response from the government, articulated by Social Services Secretary Norman Fowler, highlighted a pressing need to combat A.I.D.S. without entering moral debates, asserting that the disease poses a significant public health risk. Ironically, while Thatcher had previously critiqued the permissive society and advocated for stricter controls over sexual content in media, members of her Conservative government expressed concern about potentially alienating those whose habits needed reform. Despite the moral implications surrounding A.I.D.S., officials, including junior Agriculture Minister John Gummer, emphasised the need to differentiate between condemning the actions associated with the disease and the individuals affected by it. The unfolding dialogue reflected a deep societal division on the issues of sexuality, health, and moral responsibility during a critical time in the fight against the A.I.D.S. epidemic.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand