Sexual Series Decision Reserved (Press, 11 December 1986)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Sexual Series Decision Reserved (Press, 11 December 1986)
On 11 December 1986, the Indecent Publications Tribunal in Wellington reserved its decision regarding the distribution of a sexuality series titled "Face to Face." The series is planned to be released in 96 weekly parts and includes discussions on various topics such as contraceptive advice, bondage, masturbation, and oral sex, which have historically faced scrutiny for their indecency. Mr Peter Eggleton from the Customs Department argued that while the seized copies from Auckland last August provided informative content, they also contained sensitive subjects that could warrant age restrictions. Geoffrey Ellis, representing the publisher Marshall Cavendish and distributor Gordon and Gotch, indicated high sales expectations in New Zealand, estimating approximately 26,000 copies at a cover price of $2.50, with plans for a significant advertising campaign to support its launch in February. Dr Graham Davidson, a Wellington clinical psychologist, defended the series, suggesting that it offers a respectful and open examination of sexuality, although he acknowledged that some individuals might take issue with certain sections. He expressed that the presentation was unlikely to be deemed offensive, but cautioned that early adolescents without adequate guidance could misinterpret the material. In contrast, Miss Patricia Bartlett, representing the Society for the Protection of Community Standards, argued for an R18 restriction, citing the previous series "New Man and New Woman," which had gained visibility in local bookshops and dairies, thus potentially attracting a younger audience. Tribunal chairman Judge Richard Kearney noted that "Face to Face" appeared aimed at the young adult demographic, particularly those contemplating marriage, highlighting the ongoing debate about the appropriateness and impact of such material on younger readers.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand