This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Looking Back With Discomfort (Press, 20 June 1986)
In a review published on 20 June 1986, KEN STRONGMAN critiques the television adaptation of Malcolm Bradbury’s novel "The History Man", focusing on the character of Howard Kirk, portrayed by Antony Sher. The review highlights Kirk as an exaggerated embodiment of a particular type of academic from the early 1970s, marked by his flamboyant style with a Zapata moustache, leather attire, flared trousers, and granddad shirts. Strongman describes Kirk as a repulsive figure who exemplifies the pretentiousness and self-importance prevalent in the academic world during that era. The setting is the fictitious University of Watermouth, a microcosm of the 1970s' academic culture, characterised by a casual atmosphere filled with Afghan coats, cushions, and the incessant sound of sitar music. This world is depicted as one where sociology lecturer Kirk notes, “everybody exploits somebody,” capturing the essence of a time where personal insecurities were openly discussed and explored. The review likens the camera angles used in the production to highlight the contrast between both emotional distance and intimate familiarity with the characters, contributing to the overarching theme of superficiality. Through various interactions, such as an exchange between Kirk and a student questioning her sexuality, Strongman illustrates the morally ambiguous and often offensive nature of Kirk's character, who manipulates conversations to provide self-serving advice. The review conveys a sense of discomfort towards Kirk and the other characters who engage in narcissistic and pretentious behaviour, suggesting that the depiction is both startlingly accurate and exaggerated. The first episode of the adaptation is noted for its intense atmosphere, filled with brittle characters caught in a web of intense emotions and facades. Strongman praises the dramatization for effectively capturing the essence of the book and the cultural climate, although he acknowledges that the material might not appeal to everyone. He describes the interplay of relationships and the chaotic lives of the characters—where seduction, cynicism, and despair intertwine—as both tragic and potentially humorous, closing with a reflection on the performance of television weather presenter Stephen Harris, who contributes to the review's exploration of the broader societal context. Overall, Strongman's review suggests that while "The History Man" may not provide universally enjoyable viewing due to its unsettling character portrayals, it serves as a powerful reflection of a tumultuous time and is worth watching for its artistry and its poignant commentary on human behaviour and societal dynamics.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand