Sex Education (Press, 30 May 1986)

On 30 May 1986, letters published in response to ongoing discussions surrounding the Family Planning Association (F.P.A.) highlighted contrasting views on sexual education and morality for young people. Paul Johnstone, a secondary school counsellor, expressed frustration with what he termed the “moral minorities” who accuse the F.P.A. of promoting casual sex among youth. He defended the organisation, arguing that it prioritises collaboration among families, schools, and students while emphasising personal integrity prior to any sexual encounters. According to Johnstone, the F.P.A.’s educational approach potentially fosters sexual restraint rather than licence. He praised the association for its valuable support for young people through direct assistance and resources provided to counsellors. Johnstone suggested that parental involvement and concern regarding sexual education in earlier years could have rendered some of the F.P.A.’s services obsolete. He encouraged parents to read the F.P.A.’s publication titled “Deciding and Choosing” for guidance in dealing with issues beyond fear and anger. In contrast, H.G. Oram responded to a previous letter regarding parental concerns about sexual education. Oram highlighted comments made by Dr Goldwater, who suggested that a significant number of 13-year-old boys may identify as homosexual and would be ill-equipped to make safe sexual choices. Oram critiqued the focus on a Freudian-humanistic philosophy, which promotes safe sexual practices rather than a foundation of moral teaching against engaging in illicit sexual behaviour. He asserted that a true moral framework, aligning more closely with Judaeo-Christian values, would advocate for abstaining from what is deemed wrong rather than merely promoting safe practices. Oram proposed that fostering the ability to say “no” would enhance self-esteem more effectively than the focus on safety or legal reforms concerning homosexuality. These letters reflect a broader societal debate during the mid-1980s in New Zealand regarding sexual education, moral values, and the role of organisations like the F.P.A. in shaping the attitudes and behaviours of young people. The discussion underscores the tension between progressive sexual education and conservative moral beliefs, with advocates from both sides presenting their perspectives on how best to protect and educate the youth.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand