AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Rejection Of Clause Upsets Homosexuals (Press, 18 April 1986)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Rejection Of Clause Upsets Homosexuals (Press, 18 April 1986)

On 18 April 1986, the ongoing discussion surrounding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill highlighted significant concerns about the rights of homosexual men in New Zealand. While the bill aimed to decriminalise consensual sexual activity between males aged 16 and over, campaigners expressed disappointment over the rejection of a crucial anti-discrimination clause by Parliament. This clause, which sought to make discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation illegal, was viewed by advocates as essential for achieving true equality. Peter Wall, a spokesman for the Gay Task Force, articulated the deep disappointment felt within the homosexual community. He stated that while decriminalising homosexuality would be a significant victory, the absence of legal protection against discrimination represented a continued struggle against societal prejudice. He remarked that the decision by Parliament felt like "another slap in the face," indicating that the ruling was particularly painful coming from a legislative body that could have made a more comprehensive commitment to equality. The initial part of the bill had previously passed its committee stages, but the vote on Wednesday saw the anti-discrimination element rejected by a significant margin of 49 votes to 36. This outcome raised concerns among supporters of the bill about the likelihood of the entire reform being defeated in the final reading. Wall noted the paradox in Parliament's willingness to decriminalise homosexual acts while simultaneously permitting discrimination in employment and housing, suggesting that societal acceptance remained conditional rather than unconditional. The reform was seen as a pivotal moment for young individuals struggling with their sexual identity, as the criminalisation of homosexuality had severe psychological implications. Opponents of the bill, including Graeme Lee, a member of Parliament, expressed uncertainty about the final outcome, even after the recent vote had bolstered their position. Overall, the discussions surrounding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill underlined the complexities and challenges faced by the homosexual community in New Zealand during this period, as they sought both legal recognition and protection against discrimination.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:18th April 1986
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19860418_2_31.html