London Council Shuts Up Shop Today (Press, 1 April 1986)

On 1 April 1986, London's local government structure underwent significant change as the Greater London Council (G.L.C.) and six other left-wing authorities were abolished by the Conservative Government, marking the end of nearly a century of local governance. This transformation was met with fanfare, including fireworks and a concert at the Royal Festival Hall, celebrating the culmination of a week-long tribute to the G.L.C. and its notable leader, “Red Ken” Livingstone, who had presided over the council for the past five years. The Conservative Government, led by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, deemed the G.L.C. and the associated councils as inefficient, undemocratic, and overly costly. Following the dissolution, London's governance would be unique among major West European capitals, as it would operate without a central authority. The powers previously held by the G.L.C. would be redistributed among approximately 80 different organisations, including unelected groups and various government departments. Many responsibilities, such as fire services, refuse disposal, and highway planning, would now fall under the jurisdiction of London’s 33 borough councils, while certain aspects of public transport would be managed elsewhere. Livingstone’s tenure was marked by several controversial initiatives, such as declaring London a nuclear-free zone and fostering relationships with Nicaragua, which earned him both supporters and critics. His final acts were seen as a spending spree before leaving office, with substantial housing contracts being secured just days before the council's dissolution. The transition raised concerns regarding the impact on public services, particularly in the areas of bus services, arts funding, and potential property tax increases in the boroughs. Although it was reported that nearly all of the G.L.C.’s 24,000 staff would secure new employment, around 1,000 positions within voluntary groups faced uncertainty. Critics of the move, including journalist Neal Ascherson, condemned the abolition as politically motivated and detrimental, labelling it "vicious and petty" with shameful implications for those involved in its implementation. Despite opposition from various quarters, the successful passing of the abolition through Parliament was facilitated by a cooperative effort aimed at preventing potential chaos in the affected cities. Livingstone, now transitioning to national politics, viewed the G.L.C. as having made substantial contributions during its existence, contrasting with the government's perspective that labelled the councils as detrimental to effective governance in London.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand