AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Where We Came In (Press, 11 December 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Where We Came In (Press, 11 December 1985)

On 11 December 1985, Mary O’Regan, the head of the Ministry of Women’s Affairs, discussed the implications of women's liberation for both men and women. She emphasised that sex-role stereotyping negatively affects both genders and that achieving genuine equality would provide greater choices and opportunities for everyone. The discussion referenced philosophical reflections on gender, invoking the idea that humanity’s original divine image was androgynous, consisting of both masculine and feminine elements. O’Regan’s insights suggest that traditional views of gender, exemplified by the biblical figures of Adam and Eve, create a binary understanding that confines individuals to specific roles. This constructs a narrative of a male and female existence that is often interpreted through the lens of partnership as well as division. The commentary further explores the consequences of these historical roles, likening them to a “primal Sex-role Stereotype” that has evolved over time, encapsulating the struggles of both genders. The reference to Eve as potentially responsible for the original sin highlights the ongoing discourse around gender responsibility and societal roles. O’Regan suggests a reconsideration of these roles and an acknowledgment of the need for change. By questioning the established norms and referencing philosophical and biblical texts, O’Regan advocates for a shift in perception regarding gender roles. In her view, a focus on equality and liberation could lead to a society where barriers based on gender are diminished, allowing for a richer and more diverse experience of life for all individuals. The call for a new understanding of gender identity and social constructs indicates a movement toward inclusivity and challenges the traditional dichotomy of male and female roles.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:11th December 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19851211_2_89.html