AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Homosexual Acts Voted To Be Sinful (Press, 4 November 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Homosexual Acts Voted To Be Sinful (Press, 4 November 1985)

On 3 November 1985, the Presbyterian Church General Assembly meeting in Dunedin made a significant decision regarding its stance on homosexuality. The assembly voted 138 to 107, with 65 abstentions, in favour of a resolution declaring that homosexual acts are sinful. This resolution replaces a previous recommendation that suggested the decriminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting adults conducted in private.

The resolution, although affirming God's love and acceptance of homosexual individuals, called for a compassionate ministry for those living a homosexual lifestyle. It highlighted the belief in the power of Jesus Christ to forgive and the Holy Spirit's ability to transform lives. Rev. R. M. Yule from Christchurch, who moved the amendment, stated that by setting the age limit for legal homosexual activity at 20, it aligned with British law. He expressed his deep involvement with the homosexual community and his belief in their potential for change.

Support for the motion also came from Rev. R. McKenzie of Dunedin, who reiterated biblical teachings that suggest those who engage in homosexual acts will not enter the Kingdom of Heaven. He emphasised the necessity of affirming the gospel's hope and God's power to deliver individuals from what the Bible categorises as sin.

However, not all assembly members were in agreement. Rev. G. E. Burgess from Christchurch argued against the fairness of the 20-year age limit, recalling her own experiences as a sexually active 19-year-old. She raised concerns that individuals engaging in homosexual acts would be criminalised until they reached the age of 20.

The dissenting voices included Rev. R. J. Galvin, who represented those who opposed the resolution. He expressed that some parts of the motion seemed condescending and suggested that God would be displeased with the assembly's decision.

The assembly's choice reflects the complex tensions between traditional religious beliefs and the emerging societal changes regarding homosexuality during that period.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:4th November 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19851104_2_50.html