Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 4 November 1985)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 4 November 1985)
In a letter published on 4 November 1985, Paul Maling engaged in a heated debate regarding the nature of sexual behaviour, responding to David Shanks' critique of his use of the term "normal." Maling asserted that his understanding of normalcy is rooted in biological and evolutionary context rather than subjective opinions. Citing Dr Wainwright Churchill, he argued that all sexual behaviours, whether heterosexual, homosexual, or autoerotic, are grounded in the phylogeny and developmental history of species. He referenced a statement attributed to Kinsey, suggesting that abnormal sexual acts are those that cannot be performed, inferring that, from a biological perspective, rape could be considered "normal." Maling acknowledged that this viewpoint might disturb Shanks, who presumably envisions more agreeable sexual interactions rather than violent ones. He further cited Dr C. Tripp, noting that many female mammals may become aroused only after being aggressively pursued, implying that societal norms may overly sanitise natural behaviour. In response, another correspondent refuted Maling's assertions about ancient Greek society's views on sodomy and its necessity for a robust civilization. This writer pointed out that while sodomy was practiced in ancient Greece, it was confined to specific age groups, particularly involving boys before puberty, and does not mean it was vital for Greek accomplishments. The argument was made that there were numerous other contributing factors to the strength and success of ancient civilisations. They noted that other societies considered strong, including Jewish communities and the Romans, did not engage in active homosexual practices. The letter concluded with skepticism towards the idea that New Zealand's practical, farming-oriented culture could evolve into a refined artistic community similar to ancient Greece merely by decriminalising homosexuality.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand