AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 28 October 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 28 October 1985)

In a series of letters to the editor published in "The Press," contributors express dissatisfaction with the portrayal of discussions surrounding sodomy and homosexual law reform in New Zealand. David Shanks responds to Paul Maling's views on the use of the term "normal," particularly in relation to sodomy. Shanks argues that Maling's conclusion—that describing sodomy as "normal" could lead to the absurd conclusion that rape is also "normal"—is flawed. He accuses Maling of failing to defend his stance logically and suggests that Maling's rhetoric serves more to dismiss opposing viewpoints as subjective rather than engage in meaningful debate. Shanks criticises Maling’s assertion that some aspects of “mammalian normality,” such as rape, can be discussed without moral implications, claiming that this view undermines important value judgments about morality. Another contributor, Ralph Knowles, raises concerns about media coverage of the homosexual law reform debate, specifically objecting to what he perceives as biased reporting by "The Press." He notes that the newspaper's coverage devoted disproportionately limited space to opposing viewpoints, focusing primarily on those against or wary of the proposed reforms. Knowles highlights that the report neglected an important speech made by the Lyttelton MP, Mrs Hercus, who presented factual support for the bill, including results from her poll and a more nuanced analysis of the public's sentiment. He argues for a more balanced and complete representation of the debate, reflecting a more comprehensive understanding of the support for the proposed reforms and the various opinions surrounding them.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:28th October 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19851028_2_100_13.html