Ted Mulcock. (Press, 16 October 1985)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Ted Mulcock. (Press, 16 October 1985)
On 14 October 1985, a letter was published in response to Vernon Wilkinson's previous claims regarding sodomy and its legality. The letter challenges Wilkinson's assertion that the existence of laws against sodomy implies that it is abnormal. The author argues that the capacity for sodomy is a natural aspect of male sexuality, suggesting that attempts to legislate against it stem from a misguided attempt to impose particular moral and religious standards associated with Hebrew traditions. The letter contends that such laws are futile, citing historical examples such as the atrocities committed during Nazi rule and under religious fundamentalism, which failed to eradicate this aspect of human behaviour. The writer also points out that the term ‘sodomy’ was introduced well after the biblical texts were composed, arguing that the “Sin of Sodom” referenced in the Bible is not directly related to homosexuality. Additionally, the author mentions that before being exiled to Babylon, practices such as anal intercourse were acknowledged and even accepted among the Hebrew people. The letter closes without revealing the author’s identity, simply signing off with "Yours, etc."
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand