‘Gay’ Law Divides Synod (Press, 8 October 1985)

On 8 October 1985, the Christchurch Anglican Diocesan Synod held a meeting where it reaffirmed its support for homosexual law reform, despite significant internal division on the issue. Canon John Greenslade from Cashmere addressed the Synod, urging members not to ignore the topic. He presented a motion that reiterated a policy adopted in 1979, consisting of two resolutions: first, supporting the decriminalisation of homosexual acts between consenting males in private, provided there were appropriate safeguards for minors; and second, opposing discrimination against individuals based on their homosexuality, including in employment. An attempt to bypass discussion of the motion was rejected on a technicality, leading to a vote without a formal debate. The first part of the motion, concerning support for law reform, passed successfully. However, when a division was called on the second part against discrimination, it also passed with a vote of 104 to 43. Canon Greenslade emphasised the importance of conveying that homosexuals were not viewed as criminals by the Synod. He criticized the increasing "oppressive influence" from some Christian groups opposing the reform, which he felt stemmed from fear and hostility. He asserted that negative traits such as pride, jealousy, and greed are condemned in the Bible, yet individuals exhibiting these traits are not considered criminals. He pointed out that lesbianism is similarly not classified as a criminal offence and highlighted this as a significant injustice in the legal system. Greenslade reminded attendees that Jesus associated with individuals deemed criminal by society, illustrating their inherent worth. He also questioned how many clergy engaged in genuine conversations with homosexuals about their personal struggles. Reflecting on his own experiences, he shared insights about three strong and capable homosexual men actively involved in church affairs, one of whom was celibate. Greenslade found it offensive and absurd to label such individuals as criminals and urged the Synod to maintain courage and confront the issue, warning against the cowardice of failing to engage in more positive debate. Despite the passing of the resolutions, several Synod members anticipated backlash from parishioners in response to the decisions made. The Bishop of Christchurch, Right Rev. Maurice Goodall, who presided over the meeting, expressed concern over the lack of debate surrounding the motion, reminding members that their vote was not an assessment of the morality of homosexual acts.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand