There’s A Bit Of The Romantic Spy In All Of Us (Press, 1 October 1985)

In the commentary by Neal Ascherson published in the London "Observer" on 1 October 1985, he reflects on the deterioration of Anglo-Soviet relations following a halt in the exchange of populations between Britain and the Soviet Union. This exchange had previously been a source of mutual interaction, but its cessation has led to significant ramifications, particularly in how both nations view espionage and intelligence activities. The response from the Soviet Union, stemming from British actions involving the K.G.B. (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti), surprised the British, although they appeared less outraged by K.G.B. operations in London than they claimed to be. According to Ascherson, the British Foreign Office suggests that while the K.G.B. has been excessive in their methods, spying is an expected consequence of an open political system. This perspective reveals a stoic acceptance of espionage, shaped by decades of Cold War history, where the West has gradually normalised the presence of spies. Historically, the morality surrounding intelligence work was more rigid, but recent attitudes seem to reflect a more indifferent view of the practice. Ascherson references the work of writers like John le Carré, highlighting a growing fascination with spies that transcends traditional moral boundaries, thus complicating public perceptions of espionage. The column discusses a cultural shift where secrecy, once revered, is now challenged by a burgeoning desire for transparency in government. Ascherson contrasts past views of spies as honourable figures with modern portrayals that often depict them as mundane bureaucrats. He notes that this erosion of respect for secrecy creates a paradox, as the need for state secrecy persists despite public disillusionment. Ascherson shares his personal experiences with spies, noting their complex natures and the internal conflicts they face. He points out that while many spies lead secretive lives, they often long for genuine connections and recognition, akin to how ordinary people might feel. The romanticism of espionage is discussed, highlighting the dual identities that spies navigate, and the essence of performance in their roles, both professionally and personally. In closing, Ascherson reflects on the universal aspect of human complexity, suggesting that spies, with their ability to embody different selves, might be more relatable to individuals than one might expect. He concludes with contemplations on the nature of identity—both of spies and of people in general—indicating a shared capacity for multiplicity in our lives.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand