AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 28 September 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 28 September 1985)

The Anglican Church in New Zealand has officially expressed its support for the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, a decision that has sparked a variety of strong reactions in the community. Critics argue that this decision contradicts centuries of Christian teaching, which condemns homosexuality based on various biblical texts. Letters published in response to this announcement reflect a mix of outrage and support for traditional views on sexuality, with contributors citing specific scripture passages to reinforce their stance. Bert Walker condemned the church’s decision, arguing that it undermines biblical teachings and enables what he views as the immoralisation of society, while also accusing the World Council of Churches of promoting a Marxist agenda. Others, such as Mrs P. E. O'Callaghan, expressed concern over the implications of the law reform bill for workplace freedoms, suggesting that it would infringe upon employers' rights to choose their employees. Richard Courtenay similarly lamented the shift in societal values, asserting that some clergymen deny the biblical condemnation of sodomy, pointing to various scriptural references. Enid M. Lewis and E. Glenys Lewis questioned the legitimacy of those who presented a petition against the law reform, doubting their representation of the broader populace and critiquing the emotional tactics employed at the protest. Vernon Wilkinson voiced discomfort with the perceived "trendy" nature of the bill and raised questions about societal norms, indicating skepticism regarding the acceptance of homosexual teachers in schools, while also suggesting that laws against bestiality could face similar scrutiny if societal views shifted. Letitia B. Onions highlighted the integrity of the gay community's efforts, arguing against the confrontational tactics used by the opposition and suggesting that their approach is more respectful of democratic processes. Finally, Ian Rowland and Yvonne Holmes defended the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, pointing out that while the anti-reform petition gathered a substantial number of signatures, recent polls indicate that over 60% of New Zealanders actually support decriminalising homosexuality, thereby challenging the narrative that the anti-reform movement represents the majority view. Overall, the debate surrounding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill is marked by deep divisions within New Zealand society, reflecting broader global conversations about sexuality, rights, and morality.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:28th September 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19850928_2_99_9.html