Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 14 August 1985)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 14 August 1985)
On 14 August 1985, letters published in a newspaper revealed the ongoing debate regarding a proposed bill by Fran Wilde aimed at legalising homosexual practices in New Zealand. One letter, written by Neville M. Rush, recounted a meeting held at the Horticultural Hall where Wilde and a panel advocated for the bill. Rush expressed appreciation for the orderliness of the meeting, in contrast to other events where he felt dissenting voices, particularly from Christians, were often dismissed amid disruptive behaviour from proponents of homosexuality. He highlighted that many Christians attended the meeting, demonstrating civility and respect in their dialogue, which he found lacking in encounters with homosexual activists who he claimed resorted to shouting and indecent conduct. Another letter by Vernon Wilkinson expressed strong opposition to Wilde's bill, positing that its primary intention was to legitimise sodomy, predominantly practised by males. Wilkinson dismissed claims that legalising homosexual practices would aid in the fight against A.I.D.S., referring to existing laws against prostitution that do not effectively combat issues related to sexually transmitted diseases. He voiced concerns that the bill could disrupt family structures and undermine traditional values, drawing parallels to what he viewed as societal degradation stemming from the permissiveness of the 1970s and contemporary advancements like artificial insemination and surrogacy. Wilkinson warned that such legalisation could erode social restraints and contribute to further chaos in family life and sexual relationships. These letters encapsulate the societal tensions of the era surrounding issues of homosexuality, legal rights, and family values, reflecting contrasting perspectives on how legislative changes could impact New Zealand society.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand