Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 30 July 1985)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 30 July 1985)
In a letter published on 30 July 1985, Philip G. Ney responded to Dr Max Abbott's news release claiming unanimous support for the Homosexual Law Reform Bill among participants of a Mental Health Foundation conference. Ney, a participant and board member of the foundation, expressed his disagreement with the proposed changes to the law. He described the bill as naive, stating that it wrongly assumes attitudes can be changed through legislation. He argued that the bill lacks foresight by not considering the long-term consequences of legalising homosexuality, citing examples from New York where an increase in homosexuality has led to a perceived shortage of heterosexual men. Ney also characterised the bill as reactionary since it does not accommodate individuals who may wish to change their sexual orientation. He emphasised that framing homosexuality as an immutable condition limits the potential for change, whereas viewing it as changeable acknowledges the desires of some to alter their sexual orientation. He advocated for a more acceptable law, suggesting that the current proposal fails to meet the needs of diverse perspectives. Ney's letter conveys a critical stance towards the bill, highlighting concerns over legislative approaches to complex social issues.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand