Women Get A.I.D.S. From Donor Sperm (Press, 27 July 1985)

On 27 July 1985, uncertainty surrounded the fate of women involved in Sydney's Artificial Insemination Programme, particularly concerning the risk of A.I.D.S. transmission. New South Wales Health Minister Ron Mulcock acknowledged that while the risk of further A.I.D.S. infections was considered remote, he could not provide guarantees regarding the safety of past participants. The programme, which had been halted in October 1984, had exposed some women to potential A.I.D.S. infection through semen used in inseminations. Reports indicated that four women were receiving treatment for A.I.D.S. after receiving contaminated semen at Westmead Hospital back in 1982. The situation escalated when it was disclosed that the sperm donor who posed a potential risk had identified himself as bisexual and had opted out of the programme after raising concerns about A.I.D.S. However, by that time, he had already made donations while in the programme. Dr John Tyler, the scientific director of the programme, stated that officials were unaware of any health issues with their donors at the time, as all participants were deemed healthy. The suspicions about the safety of the semen led to the programme's cancellation. In response to public demand for artificial insemination services, the government announced the reinstatement of the programme with significantly stricter screening protocols for donors. Professor David Penington, chairman of Australia’s A.I.D.S. Task Force, and Dr Graeme Stewart of the Clinical Immunology Unit at Westmead, expressed confidence that the risk of additional cases would likely be minimal due to the implementation of new safety measures in the sperm donation process. The health officials reported that the four women affected were unlikely to develop severe A.I.D.S. symptoms and were expected to maintain healthy lives, despite testing positive for A.I.D.S. antibodies, indicating prior exposure to the virus. Notably, neither the women’s husbands nor their children tested positive for the A.I.D.S. antibody, suggesting limited potential for virus transmission within those intimate circles. Overall, while experts expected new cases of A.I.D.S. in Australia in the coming years, they believed that recent efforts had significantly mitigated the spread of the virus. The public health outlook remained cautious, but with the improved safety protocols, there was a collective hope for enhanced protection against A.I.D.S. among future users of the artificial insemination programme.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand