Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 23 May 1985)

In a recent exchange of letters published in a New Zealand newspaper, two correspondents expressed opposing views on the controversial Homosexual Law Reform Bill. Mark D. Sadler argued against the idea of heterosexuality being threatened by the bill, claiming that there is a growing movement to redefine flirtation between heterosexuals as sexual harassment, which he believes could lead to legal ramifications. He cited a survey by Alfred Kinsey, indicating that a significant number of male teenagers engage in homosexual activities, suggesting that sexual orientation can be fluid, particularly among the poorly educated. Sadler implied that the legislation, which some proponents argue fixes sexual orientation at an early age, could inadvertently lead to more males identifying as homosexual as they mature. In stark contrast, Hilary Wilson expressed her disquiet regarding what she perceives as a hate campaign against homosexuality. She voiced her concerns about the hostility directed towards supporters of the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, describing it as reminiscent of the past oppression experienced during the Muldoon era in New Zealand. Wilson championed the rights of gay individuals to love freely, comparable to heterosexual relationships, and urged those who had been coerced into signing a petition against the bill to reconsider their stance and alleviate the harm caused by such actions. Both letters reflect the heated debate surrounding homosexual rights in New Zealand during this period, underlining the complex interplay of social attitudes, legal reforms, and the push for equality.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand