AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

‘Many Misunderstand’ Effect Of Reform Bill (Press, 21 May 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: ‘Many Misunderstand’ Effect Of Reform Bill (Press, 21 May 1985)

Dr Don McMorland, a key figure in drafting the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, expressed disappointment regarding widespread misconceptions among New Zealanders about the bill's implications for the Human Rights Commission Act. Speaking on 21 May 1985, he clarified that the Human Rights Commission Act remains unchanged in terms of marriage, adoption, custody, and the ability to criticise homosexuals based on their sexual orientation. He emphasised that the bill specifically addresses discrimination against individuals based solely on their homosexual identity and does not alter existing laws concerning marriage or familial rights, which are governed by separate statutes. Dr McMorland noted that the Human Rights Commission Act is limited to issues of employment, housing, and access to services. He highlighted an apparent contradiction in the stances of certain church leaders who advocate love and compassion towards homosexuals yet oppose the anti-discrimination provisions of the bill. He suggested that true support would entail backing measures that protect the rights of homosexual individuals in the workplace and housing. Addressing concerns voiced by some church figures about potential restrictions on preaching against homosexual acts, Dr McMorland firmly stated that such fears are unfounded. He explained that while the Race Relations Act makes incitement to hostility based on race an offence, it does not apply to sexual orientation. Mainstream discourse on homosexuality is thus still permissible under the law. Dr McMorland drew comparisons with similar legislation in New South Wales, which implemented anti-discrimination laws following a report outlining the extent of discrimination and the necessity for protection. He urged that, given the reactions surrounding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill in New Zealand, there is a clear need for similar protective measures in the country to safeguard the rights of homosexual individuals.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:21st May 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19850521_2_102.html