Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 15 May 1985)

In letters published in May 1985, two individuals expressed their views regarding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, reflecting a division in public opinion on the issue and the broader themes of freedom and democracy. Paul Maling, a former member of the Second New Zealand Expeditionary Force, shared his personal journey and motivation for enlisting, noting his concern about the spread of Nazism. He conducted an informal poll among his fellow soldiers and found that none cited the defence of freedom as their reason for enlistment, which left him appalled. Upon returning from service, Maling became increasingly worried about the erosion of freedom in New Zealand. He engaged with political discourse through subscription to a National Party newspaper and attended lectures that discussed the philosophical underpinnings of freedom and the implications of totalitarianism. He cited influential works such as Friedrich Hayek's "The Road to Serfdom" and Nicolas Berdyaev's "Slavery and Freedom" as significant to his understanding of the dangers of tyranny. Maling directed his concern towards those opposing the law reform, suggesting that their ignorance undermines the essence of freedom and democracy. He urged individuals misled into signing petitions against the reform to reconsider their stance and contact Ms Fran Wilde. On the other hand, John O. Ward wrote a letter appealing to the 'silent majority' opposed to the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, highlighting the limited role of just 94 members of Parliament tasked with a conscience vote for a large number of constituents. Ward argued that constituents should actively voice their opinions on the matter, urging them to sign a petition against the bill, write to their respective MPs to express their views, and call on the Prime Minister to consider a referendum at the next General Election. His call to action indicated a desire for public engagement in the legislative process concerning the potential reform. Both letters illustrate the complexities surrounding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill and the varying perspectives on civil liberties, societal values, and democratic processes in New Zealand during this period.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand