Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 7 May 1985)

A series of letters published in May 1985 express diverse perspectives on the ongoing debate regarding homosexuality and proposed legal reforms in New Zealand. Paul Maling argues for the necessity of changing the law, asserting that the law should not impose moral judgments, as highlighted by judicial remarks about the distinction between law and morals. He references ancient Greek practices regarding homosexual relationships with young males, suggesting that such relationships aimed to inspire noble qualities and could potentially rectify social issues in modern contexts like South Africa. T. Wainwright counters the opposition to homosexuality, highlighting societal fears about recognising same-sex relationships. He criticises certain religious figures who expend significant effort opposing this recognition while seemingly neglecting more pressing societal issues such as racial injustice and domestic violence. Wainwright suggests that the fragility of traditional patriarchal structures, as indicated by the fear of legal recognition of same-sex love, is rooted in insecurity rather than genuine moral rectitude. E. R. L. Wilson points out the misuse of the term "natural" regarding homosexuality, distinguishing between its descriptive and evaluative meanings. He notes that homosexual behaviour is observed in various animal species and human societies, affirming its natural occurrence. He questions the values held by those who deem homosexuality unnatural, suggesting that such views are subjective and reflect personal biases rather than absolute truths. B. Kroon expresses deep concern about the government’s approach to what he perceives as a moral crisis rather than a nuclear threat. He argues that legislation concerning homosexuality, sex education, and other social issues is an assault on the nuclear family, which he believes is fundamental to society. Kroon questions why matters relating to family are treated as conscience issues in Parliament while nuclear policies receive definitive governmental stances. Collectively, these letters reflect a rich, contentious dialogue in New Zealand regarding the intersection of law, morality, and sexual orientation, highlighting the tension between traditional values and the push for reform in the societal understanding of homosexuality.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand