Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 3 May 1985)

In response to the ongoing debate around the Homosexual Law Reform Bill in New Zealand during 1985, a series of letters published in various New Zealand newspapers voiced strong opinions on the implications of legalising homosexuality. Varian J. Wilson expressed concern that the push for sexual equality overlooked potential dangers to young boys, suggesting that they are less protected under current laws compared to girls. He argued that while there may be a movement towards legalising consensual acts between adults, sexual equality as perceived by some advocates could lead to morally questionable practices. W. M. Parry added to the discourse by questioning the morality of changes in law, reflecting on a prior moral reform regarding abortion, which he suggested did not inherently make the act morally right even when legal. Parry implied that legislation does not equate to ethical validation, raising concerns about societal values in changing legal contexts. P. M. Wood highlighted the severe health implications associated with homosexuality, referencing a report from the British medical journal "Lancet," which noted an alarming rise in AIDS cases. He referred to comments made by virologist Dr Paul Goldwater, who warned that lifestyle changes were necessary to combat the impending epidemic linked to the disease. Wood emphasised that a significant percentage of new AIDS cases were found among homosexuals, linking health concerns to the debate on the proposed law reform. Stan Wood’s letter discussed the complexities of love, suggesting that the English language fails to adequately capture its varied meanings, particularly in relation to marriage and sexual relationships. He critiqued those who advocate for homosexual rights, implying that individuals may misinterpret their desires as love while failing to acknowledge moral consequences. He raised the issue of personal integrity and adherence to moral principles, suggesting that a change in law might lead individuals to compromise their values. Overall, the letters reflect a tumultuous societal debate in New Zealand regarding homosexuality, sex, and morality, with contributors articulating fear about social consequences, health risks, and the philosophical implications of changing laws. The letters reveal a deep divide in public opinion, with many expressing apprehension about the potential for changed legal norms to redefine moral standards within society.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand