Bishop Supports Bill, But Has Reservations (Press, 27 April 1985)

On 27 April 1985, the Rt Rev. Maurice Goodall, the Bishop of Christchurch, expressed his support for the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, specifically in its aim to decriminalise homosexual acts between consenting adults. While he acknowledged this legislative change, he clarified that it should not be interpreted as an endorsement of such acts as moral or desirable for Christians. In his monthly newsletter, Bishop Goodall emphasised the importance of separating law from morality in personal matters, stating that the Church should not exclude individuals based on their sexual orientation but should instead promote Christ's teachings with compassion and humility. He noted that there is much to learn regarding sexuality within the faith community. Additionally, Bishop Goodall highlighted two significant principles discussed by the Rt Rev. Peter Atkins, the Bishop of Waiapu, relevant to the ongoing debate surrounding the bill. The first principle questions whether every sinful act should also be criminal. He reasoned that if all sinful acts were criminalised, many other behaviours, such as pride, greed, and adultery, would also need to be legislated against, which would be impractical. Goodall argued that the moral and spiritual teachings of Jesus, rather than criminal law, should guide Christian conduct. The second principle raised by Atkins considered whether private behaviour is of societal concern. Goodall asserted that a Christian's thoughts and actions influence society, although the extent varies based on interaction with others. He noted the importance of a Christian witness in self-discipline and self-control for the benefit of society. Conversely, the Rt Rev. Peter Sutton, the Bishop of Nelson, expressed reservations about the Homosexual Law Reform Bill. He critiqued it for failing to promote healthy human relationships, urging individuals to approach the topic with a sense of responsible love. While he agreed that penalising individuals based on sexual orientation is unjust, he cautioned against allowing sexual orientation to lead to unrestricted homosexual behaviours. Sutton expressed concern about the timing of relaxing sexual activity restraints, especially in light of the growing apprehension around the AIDS epidemic in the community. He concluded that societal moral standards should not be dictated by a minority group. In summary, the discussions among these Anglican bishops highlighted a tension between supporting the decriminalisation of homosexual acts and concerns regarding morality, societal influence, and public health implications.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand