AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 27 April 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 27 April 1985)

In a letter to the editor published in "The Press" on 27 April 1985, E. G. Overton, the pastor of North Beach Methodist Church, articulated his opposition to a proposed law reform that he and his congregation believe could have detrimental effects on family structures in New Zealand. Overton stated that love and understanding are needed for all people, including homosexuals, but he argued that supporting the proposed bill would not reflect true love as it could harm the nation. He expressed a desire to distance his views from those of the National Council of Churches and the Methodist Conference of New Zealand, suggesting that these organisations inadvertently endorse ideas that could worsen the already strained family life due to moral issues in society. Overton characterised the proposed legislation as a disobedience to what he considers the laws of God and nature. In a separate response, J. Ngarimu refuted Gregory Smith's statement that equated homosexuality solely with sodomy, labelling it as lacking any scientific or theological support. This response underscores a contention in the community regarding the interpretations of homosexuality and its implications. Additionally, Sue Scheele contributed her view concerning the societal issues arising from theft. In her perspective, if an individual like Noreen Queree only steals from other thieves who are consenting adults over the age of 16, then there is no cause for societal concern, suggesting a more lenient view on crime based on the context of the act. Overall, the correspondence reflected the various social and moral debates occurring at the time, with strong opinions surrounding the legislation and its potential impact on New Zealand society.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:27th April 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19850427_2_117_1.html