Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 12 April 1985)

In response to the ongoing debate over homosexual law reform, two letters were published in The Press on 9 and 6 April 1985, prompting significant discussion. The first letter, written by Shaun Jones from Wellington, critiques the Salvation Army's stance on homosexuality. Jones argues that the Army’s refusal to condone changes to laws surrounding homosexuality indicates a self-serving agenda, highlighting that by maintaining homosexuality as a crime, the organisation is effectively ensuring a continued supply of issues to address. He suggests that this contradicts the Army's mission of salvation, labelling such an approach as philosophically bankrupt. Jones questions the morality of an organisation that appears more concerned with its operational needs than with aiding its constituents. The second letter, authored by Keith Wignall, challenges J. L. Camp's earlier assertions regarding the reliability of biblical truths. Wignall points out the inconsistency in Camp's logic, emphasising that the theories presented in the Bible are not provable in the same manner that scientific observations are, thus casting doubt on the assertion of absolute truths derived from scripture. He argues that all observations, including those pertaining to life and purpose, can be subjective and that the nature of divine revelations cannot be verified. Wignall further comments on the biological differences between genders, suggesting that male and female anatomies serve distinct roles aligned with their respective needs. These letters reflect the contentious nature of the homosexual law reform discourse in New Zealand during the 1980s, highlighting a clash between traditional moral viewpoints and emerging progressive perspectives. The debate reveals not only differing interpretations of morality and purpose but also questions the role of religious organisations in shaping social attitudes and laws. Ultimately, these discussions encapsulate the complexity of reconciling faith-based ideals with the evolving landscape of human rights and individual freedom in New Zealand society.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand