Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 6 April 1985)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 6 April 1985)
In a series of letters published on 6 April 1985, various individuals express their views on the contentious Homosexual Law Reform Bill in New Zealand. GERALD ORCHARD addresses concerns raised by L. J. Cooper regarding the implications of the bill, clarifying that while sexual conduct involving males aged 12 to 16 could potentially involve a defence if specific conditions are met, the framework for such cases aligns with existing laws concerning sexual conduct with girls in the same age group. J. L. CAMP responds to R. E. Turner’s proposal to declare the Bible illegal by critiquing the rationale behind defining legality based on agreement or disagreement with specific ideas. He argues that the Bible encompasses more than just the relationship between men and women and that a belief in its teachings does not correlate with increases in violent crimes such as rape. A. D. CARSTAIRS challenges Cardinal Williams's stance that the Church's teachings on sexual morality should be enforced through law. He contends that such an imposition reveals a lack of confidence in persuading the public through dialogue, and highlights the historical injustices faced by Catholics in Britain, drawing a parallel to current legal penalties faced by individuals expressing love in same-sex relationships. Finally, STAN L. JELLEY summarises key points of the Homosexual Law Reform Bill, detailing how it seeks to criminalise certain behaviours involving young boys, redefine issues of consent, and address discrimination based on sexual orientation. He urges clarity on the aims of the bill and suggests that opponents may inadvertently support harmful behaviours. Jelley also advocates for the legitimacy of stable same-sex relationships, arguing they should not be perceived as a threat. The letters reflect the broader societal debates on morality, legality, and the rights of individuals in relation to ongoing reforms in New Zealand's legal landscape.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand