Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 3 April 1985)

On 3 April 1985, several letters to the editor were published discussing the ongoing debate around homosexual law reform in New Zealand. The correspondence highlighted differing opinions regarding morality, legality, and the acceptance of homosexuality within society, particularly from a religious perspective. Hugh Gaw, one of the letter writers, expressed criticism of Cardinal Williams for what he perceived as confusion regarding the distinction between legal and moral issues. He pointed out that while the Catholic Church views all sexual activity outside of marriage as immoral, it rarely advocates for legal action against behaviors like adultery, masturbation, or the use of contraception. Gaw questioned whether Cardinal Williams would support sanctions against such activities if he persists in his opposition to homosexual law reform. He concluded with a provocative reflection on the nature of what is considered "unnatural," comparing human behaviour with animal instinct, noting instances of same-sex activity among animals and their lack of contraception use. Another letter, penned by Sharon Walklin, conveyed the emotional and personal dimensions of the debate. A mother of two young boys, she shared her unconditional love for her children, regardless of their sexual orientation. Walklin expressed concern about the fear and hatred directed at homosexuals by some who identify as Christians, urging a more compassionate and accepting stance, emphasising that all homosexuals were once innocent children. The third response came from B. Roberts, who challenged the reductionist views that rigidly define gender roles and morality according to traditional biblical interpretations. Roberts critiqued the interpretation presented by Gregory Smith, suggesting that it unjustly confines the discussion to a one-dimensional view of creation and sexuality. He referenced the duality of creation in the Genesis narrative, arguing for a more inclusive understanding that recognises the legitimacy of diverse identities and relationships. Roberts articulated the dangers of unchecked power dynamics that dismiss the humanity of marginalized groups, warning that such ideologies can lead to violence under the guise of discipline or correction. These letters reflect a vibrant public discourse in 1985 on issues of sexuality, morality, and the role of religion, highlighting the complexities and personal stakes involved in the debate over homosexual law reform.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand