Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 21 March 1985)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 21 March 1985)
In a series of letters published in March 1985, various correspondents discuss issues related to sexuality, consent, and societal attitudes towards homosexuals and rape. The letters appear to be responses to earlier commentary that drew controversial comparisons between rape and sodomy. Paddy Austin, representing the Women’s Electoral Lobby, clarifies the legal definitions of rape, arguing that it requires both violent force from the perpetrator and a lack of consent from the victim. He contends that consensual sexual activities among adults, regardless of sexual orientation, cannot be classified as rape. Austin expresses that women unequivocally condemn all forms of rape, while sympathising with men who may also be victims. He emphasises that Fran Wilde's proposed legislation does not intend to legalise rape, dismissing concerns related to such interpretations as unfounded. Barry Empson critiques Varian J. Wilson's perceptions of homosexual men. Empson argues that Wilson's experiences as a clinical psychologist may lead to skewed generalisations about gay men, as he mainly encounters those in need of psychological help. He points out that the American Psychiatric Association no longer classifies homosexuality as a mental illness, suggesting that Wilson's approach could inadvertently reinforce the self-doubt of his patients rather than support their acceptance of their sexual identity. J. M. Cleine responds sarcastically to a claim made by Wilkinson that issues such as rape, sexually transmitted diseases, and infertility only emerged in the 1960s. Cleine highlights historical instances of sexual irresponsibility and disease prior to that decade, questioning the validity of such a claim. He provocatively mentions historical figures and societies, indicating that issues of sexuality and human behaviour have existed throughout history, not just as a product of the modern era. Overall, the letters reveal a complex dialogue surrounding consent, mental health, and societal perceptions of sexuality in 1985, highlighting the ongoing debates and misunderstandings present at that time. The correspondents challenge each other’s views and assumptions, underscoring a broader cultural discussion about sexual ethics and acceptance in New Zealand society.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand