This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 20 March 1985)
In March 1985, a series of letters published in a New Zealand newspaper reflect the contentious debate surrounding homosexuality and the proposed Homosexual Law Reform Bill. The context of the discussion highlights that New Zealand remains the only Western country yet to formally outlaw homosexuality, with female homosexuality historically being legal and less controversial. A letter penned by J. Neill criticises the assumptions made by heterosexuals regarding the origins of homosexuality, calling out the arrogance of those who attempt to link sexual orientation to personal inadequacy. Neill challenges Varian J. Wilson's comparison of homosexual behaviour to that of individuals with schizophrenia, suggesting that such views stem from prejudice, similar to historical arguments made by figures like Hitler about racial superiority. In contrast, Marian Marsh, responding to Graham Harvey's call for personal freedom, asserts that homosexuality arises from external influences rather than being inherent. Marsh references conversations with two homosexual individuals, claiming their experiences of becoming homosexual were linked to childhood interference and seduction during vulnerable times. She questions the maturity of young people, particularly in relation to the legal age for consent, suggesting that similar flaws could affect the new law concerning homosexuality. Y. Mulder expresses dismay at the negative attitudes towards the proposal to reform homosexual laws, arguing that the private actions of consenting adults should not concern others. Mulder criticises those who conflate homosexuality with mental health issues, dismissing these comparisons as unjustified. The letter calls for equal treatment of homosexuals and heterosexuals, advocating for a legal framework that respects the rights of individuals regardless of sexual orientation, while condemning laws that criminalise consenting adult behaviour as a product of outdated and intolerant societal views. The discussions highlight deep-seated divisions in opinions regarding homosexuality in New Zealand society during this period, reflecting broader global attitudes towards LGBTQ+ rights and the struggle for equality and acceptance.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand