Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 18 March 1985)

The letters to the editor published on 18 March 1985 reflect a heated debate surrounding the liberalisation of homosexual relations in New Zealand. The discussions highlight differing perspectives on the implications of legalising sodomy and broader issues of permissiveness within society. Vernon Wilkinson argues against the liberalisation of sex by citing the negative consequences of cultural permissiveness initiated in the late 1960s, such as increased incidents of rape and issues stemming from solo parenting, along with the emerging crisis of AIDS. He contends that both women and men struggle to understand each other's perspectives on sexual consent and morality. Wilkinson suggests that while men may not express their opposition to the current legislative changes openly due to social pressures, their true sentiments will be reflected in their voting behavior, offering a cautionary note to the government about the potential backlash against liberal policies. Varian J. Wilson, a clinical psychologist, expresses concern over the portrayal of homosexuality, drawing parallels between it and various mental health issues like obsessive-compulsive disorders and substance abuse. He criticises the moral implications of legalising sodomy, particularly regarding the potential risks to minors and the challenge it presents to public health in relation to AIDS. He argues that despite good intentions, the behaviours encouraged by increasing permissiveness can lead to self-destructive outcomes. Cyndy Cottam raises a question about the long-term agenda of the gay rights movement, contending that the push to legalise private homosexual relations may lead to further liberalisation, including public displays of affection and ultimately same-sex marriage. She urges society to carefully consider the broader social implications of such legislation. Lastly, Neville M. Rush expresses his outrage at the government’s stance on homosexual legalisation while simultaneously claiming to uphold moral standards, such as the prohibition of nuclear ships. He equates legalising homosexuality with societal corruption and critiques government leaders for what he perceives as a failure to adhere to moral and religious principles. Rush argues that the consequences of these modern societal shifts, including permissive attitudes towards abortion and pre-marital sex, warrant serious consideration of the moral fabric of society. Overall, the letters convey a complex and contentious dialogue about the potential legalisation of homosexuality in New Zealand, underscoring deep-seated fears about moral decay and the long-term impacts of liberal sexual policies on society.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand