Homosexual Law Changes (Press, 14 March 1985)

On 14 March 1985, various letters published in "The Press" conveyed strong opinions surrounding the proposed Homosexual Law Reform Bill and the societal implications of homosexuality. P. Cunningham expressed a controversial view, linking sodomy with the spread of A.I.D.S. and advocating for stricter societal measures against it, claiming that the media had presented a biased portrayal of homosexuals. His focus was on the need to address what he perceived to be the root of the A.I.D.S. crisis. Matt McGlone responded to a recent editorial, arguing that the use of derogatory language towards both homosexual and heterosexual practices reflects societal disapproval of various sexual behaviours, not just those associated with homosexuality. He provided historical context to the word "gay," suggesting that its degradation was not solely the fault of homosexuals. Jean Campbell replied to Ralph Knowles' comments, defending the church's stance by implying that while homosexuality may be considered sinful, it does not warrant condemnation of individuals. Ernie Pollard from the Riccarton Baptist Church clarified that the church prioritises spiritual salvation over political activism, suggesting that the church's silence on protesting the bill should not be misconstrued as negligence. Craig Hood challenged the negative generalisations about homosexuals, asserting that the real issue lies in the prejudice they face. He highlighted the diversity within the gay community, urging society to recognise their right to exist without oppression. Graham Harvey argued for the legalisation of homosexuality, stating that the decision of whom to love should be a personal choice, free from societal judgement. He advocated for a reformed perspective towards homosexuality as a valid expression of love. E. R. L. Wilson emphasised virtues such as tolerance and respect for differences in sexual orientation, suggesting that the debate should focus on compassion and acceptance rather than judgement. Finally, M. Aspinall voiced concerns about the potential consequences of legalising homosexuality, linking it to promiscuity and the fear of an A.I.D.S. epidemic. He argued that liberalising sexual behaviour would lead to increased risks, drawing on statistics about homosexual promiscuity as evidence. These letters illustrate the deep divisions in public opinion regarding the Homosexual Law Reform Bill and highlight the broader societal discourse on sexual morality, health issues, and individual rights during this period in New Zealand.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand