AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Homosexual Law Reform (Press, 12 March 1985)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Homosexual Law Reform (Press, 12 March 1985)

On 12 March 1985, a series of letters published in a New Zealand newspaper expressed strong opposition to a proposed homosexual law reform. The letters conveyed a moral panic about the implications of legalising homosexuality, drawing parallels between the threat of nuclear weapons and the potential spread of AIDS due to increased visibility and acceptance of homosexual behaviour. E. S. Tuck warned that legalising homosexual behaviour could lead to the proliferating threat of AIDS, which he likened to a nuclear bomb that could infect the nation's bloodstream, resulting in societal extermination. He emphasized that New Zealand should not follow other countries in this matter but make its own moral decisions. L. Anderson echoed concern over the socio-economic conditions in New Zealand, highlighting issues like rising costs of living, inflation, and increasing dependency on state benefits. Anderson suggested that the legalisation of homosexuality would signify a moral decline, associating it with the Labour Party's liberal policies and calling for divine intervention for the nation. R. Freestone praised a fellow member of Parliament for opposing the law reform and criticised society's tendency to normalise what he deemed immoral actions. He lamented the silence of churches on this issue, contrasting their vocal stance on other matters. Varian J. Wilson accused proponents of the reform, particularly Fran Wilde, of misunderstanding the implications of their campaign. He described homosexuality as an obsession linked to mental illness and expressed concern that legalising it would only promote promiscuity and the spread of AIDS. Jean Campbell pointedly questioned the silence of church leaders regarding the proposed reforms, highlighting their vocal opposition to other political issues, such as the controversial All Black rugby tour. She called for unity among various religious denominations to oppose what she viewed as a disregard for divine law. Finally, Ted Mulcock cautioned against societal condemnation and ostracism of those viewed as sinners but reminded readers of divine warnings against homosexuality. He referenced historical examples of societal decline linked to widespread acceptance of homosexuality, suggesting such patterns could echo in contemporary society. Overall, these letters collectively reflect a deep-seated fear of moral decay and public health concerns associated with the proposed homosexual law reform, calling for a reassessment of personal and national values.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:12th March 1985
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19850312_2_103_10.html