The Press Tuesday, March 12, 1985. Homosexual Law... (Press, 12 March 1985)

The article published on 12 March 1985 discusses the parliamentary vote regarding the introduction of the Homosexual Law Reform Bill in New Zealand. Fifty-one members of the House of Representatives, comprising more than half of the 95 total members, voted in favour of the bill's introduction, while twenty-four opposed it, and twenty members were either absent or abstained from voting. The opposition primarily came from National Party and Social Credit members, reflecting a conscience vote without any party discipline. The article suggests that many who supported the bill did so because they believed it warranted public debate and consideration of submissions from the community. Conversely, those who abstained might hold opposing views but chose not to publicly declare their stance. This indecisiveness mirrors sentiments within the broader community, where a majority appear to favour legal reform to address perceived discrimination against homosexual males in private matters. Drawing on international evidence, the article asserts that the legalisation of consensual homosexual acts typically does not lead to societal breakdown, suggesting that such reform could facilitate easier detection and treatment of Aids, despite potential short-term risks of increasing the disease's spread as those with sexually transmitted infections may hesitate to seek treatment. The article acknowledges that significant portions of the community still hold negative views towards homosexuality, an attitude deeply entrenched over time. However, it sees potential benefits in reforming the law, such as reducing instances of blackmail against homosexual individuals and diminishing the allure of illicit sexual practices. Despite these possible advantages, the article also highlights ongoing societal prejudice, noting that derogatory language surrounding homosexuality remains commonplace and may outlast any legal changes. The term "gay," for instance, has undergone a transformation in its usage, leaving the language poorer as it shifts from its traditional meaning to its current context within the homosexual community. Overall, while the article leans towards the likelihood of the law reform's passage, it acknowledges that resistance persists among some members of Parliament and significant parts of the populace. This resistance stems from beliefs that approval of homosexual behaviour contrasts with societal norms that many consider unnatural and abhorrent. The ongoing dialogue on this issue reflects both the evolving legal landscape and the challenges of changing public attitudes toward homosexuality in New Zealand.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand