Commission Support (Press, 28 November 1984)

In March 1983, the New Zealand Human Rights Commission presented a report to Prime Minister Sir Robert Muldoon, advocating for the ratification of a women's rights convention. Despite some public concerns, a follow-up report was prepared in August 1984 to address these worries comprehensively. The latest report outlined several key points regarding the implications of ratification. Firstly, it clarified New Zealand's obligations under the convention, asserting that international conventions do not alter national law or sovereignty, and do not impose duties on individual citizens. The report dismissed fears of a "genderless society," explaining that the convention promotes equality without negating differences between men and women. Addressing the apprehension around potential support for "abortion on demand," the commission highlighted that the convention endorses reproductive rights without classifying abortion as a fundamental human right. Concerns regarding the creation of a "Godless society" were also allayed, as the report pointed out that religious freedoms are protected under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which New Zealand had already ratified. The report tackled fears about single-sex schools, stating that the convention does not impose any restrictions on such institutions, nor does it mandate changes in government funding. It emphasised that access to education should be equitable but does not force individuals into unwanted areas of study. On the issue of the term "stereotype," the commission noted that the convention aims to eliminate harmful stereotypes without undermining traditional roles unless they are deemed undesirable. Furthermore, the report reassured that the convention does not diminish the value of marriage or family, as it acknowledges the vital roles of both parents and does not mandate any changes to childcare arrangements. Concerns about the possibility of recognising "lesbian marriages" were countered by clarifying that the convention's articles regarding marriage specifically refer to relationships between men and women. The report addressed fears related to the phrase "the new economic order," explaining that it denotes a desire for equity and justice, a goal that aligns with promoting equality between genders. Lastly, the commission emphasised the positive implications of ratification, arguing that New Zealand, known for its good human rights record, should engage in international discussions to influence global standards positively. It suggested that opting out would not only harm New Zealand’s standing but also hinder opportunities to support the rights of the underprivileged globally. The report concluded that just like athletes prepare for the Olympics, engaging with international human rights forums is essential for continuous improvement.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand