Debate On Jesus (Press, 30 October 1984)

In late October 1984, public opinion surrounding the television series “Jesus—the Evidence” stirred significant controversy among Christians in New Zealand. Two individuals, Bruce Hills and Arthur Garrett, expressed their discontent through letters to the editor. Hills articulated a strong belief that Christ could not have been homosexual, stating that for Jesus to be the ultimate sacrifice and fulfil the scriptural requirements, he had to be sinless and without blemish. According to Hills, any associations with homosexuals would only have served to guide them towards righteousness rather than suggest acceptance of their lifestyle. Meanwhile, Garrett's letter conveyed frustration at what he perceived to be a dismissive attitude towards the series and the implications it carried for Christian beliefs. He compared the discussion surrounding the series to irresponsible drunken chatter, suggesting that it undermined Jesus’ significance to many. Garrett also pointed out the politeness of church leaders like the Archbishop and Bishop of Auckland, noting their lack of action against what he called the slander of Jesus. He emphasised that, as a sincere Christian, the Prime Minister should intervene to prevent the broadcast, arguing that it insults deeply held Christian values. Both letters highlight the tension within the community regarding the portrayal of Jesus and the broader implications for Christian doctrine. The responses underscore a desire for more robust actions from religious leaders and political figures to protect sacred beliefs from perceived affronts.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand