AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Jail Term For Indecencies (Press, 14 July 1984)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Jail Term For Indecencies (Press, 14 July 1984)

In a High Court ruling on 14 July 1984, Mr Justice Roper sentenced a 30-year-old sawmill worker, Alan Joseph Revell, to four years in prison following his guilty pleas to two charges of sodomy and two of indecent assault. The court heard that the offences involved repeated indecent assaults on a boy from the age of nine, with Revell admitting to about 100 incidents of indecency short of sodomy against the same child. The judge highlighted the tragic impact of Revell's actions on the victim, noting that the boy now led a homosexual lifestyle as a result of the assaults, which began when he was under Revell's care. The Crown was represented by Mr G. K. Panckhurst, while Revell's defence lawyer, Mr M. J. Glue, acknowledged the gravity of the situation and indicated that a non-custodial sentence would not be appropriate. The probation report suggested that imprisonment could help Revell address his issues and that he would benefit from counselling. Notably, Revell reportedly sought psychiatric help prior to the police investigation and expressed genuine remorse for his actions. Mr Justice Roper observed the significant coercive element in Revell's conduct, as he had threatened the boy about disclosing the abuse. Despite Revell's lack of prior convictions for similar offences and his cooperation with authorities, the judge deemed the case to have severe negative implications. Recognising the sustained nature of the abuse and its disastrous effects on the victim, he emphasised that Revell's actions represented the worst features of such crimes. In a bid to protect the victim's identity, Mr Glue sought a suppression order for Revell's name, which the judge considered in light of the circumstances surrounding the case. Ultimately, while Revell portrayed a desire to turn over a new leaf upon his release, Justice Roper made it clear that the seriousness of his crimes warranted a substantial prison sentence.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:14th July 1984
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19840714_2_39_3.html