AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Examining Evidence For Jesus (Press, 14 July 1984)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Examining Evidence For Jesus (Press, 14 July 1984)

"Jesus: The Evidence" by Ian Wilson, published in 1984, is a comprehensive examination of the historical evidence surrounding Jesus Christ, targeting the well-informed reader. The review, written by Colin Brown, highlights the meticulous scholarship that has evolved over the last two centuries, along with the significance of various academic fields such as textual, historical, and archaeological studies in expanding the understanding of Jesus' life. The book references important contributions from Jewish scholars, particularly Geza Vermes, whom Wilson frequently cites. It explores diverse theories surrounding Jesus' identity, including the suggestions that he may have been associated with the Essenes or Zealots, was a magician, or even did not exist at all. Wilson ultimately dismisses the idea of Jesus' non-existence, along with other notions like his alleged homosexuality, but he presents these discussions thoughtfully, considering the ongoing debates within historical scholarship. Wilson's writing incorporates vivid descriptions of significant New Testament manuscript discoveries and presents useful charts for dating these documents. His arguments are supported by archaeological findings, as well as insights from Jewish scholarship. Ultimately, Wilson concludes that Jesus was not simply God becoming man, as traditional Christian doctrine posits, but rather a man who became God, deified by the early Christian community. Despite the book's merits, the review notes that not all hypotheses receive equal scrutiny. Certain ideas, such as viewing Jesus as a magician, are insufficiently critiqued. Moreover, Brown points out that Wilson sometimes misses the broader religious context of the gospels, suggesting that they are inadequate historical accounts. This perspective can mislead readers regarding the gospels' multifaceted purposes, which encompass both historical and spiritual dimensions. The review criticises Wilson for making incorrect generalisations and overly simplistic statements regarding complex subjects, such as the nature of Old Testament religions, the role of women in Paul's writings, and the interpretation of papal infallibility. These elements may irritate knowledgeable readers and misinform others. Finally, Wilson's book is a byproduct of a television series that sparked significant discussion within Christian communities in the UK. The series reportedly entertained bolder hypotheses that extend beyond those explored in the book. Although it remains uncertain when the programmes will air in New Zealand, Brown recommends Wilson's book for anyone interested in the historical Jesus, regardless of their religious stance, while emphasising the need for critical engagement with its content.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:14th July 1984
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19840714_2_131_6.html