The Press Wednesday, March 23, 1983. Changing The... (Press, 23 March 1983)

On 23 March 1983, The Press published an article addressing the complex issues surrounding the investigation and prosecution of rape in New Zealand. The article highlighted the legal and societal dimensions of rape, marking it as one of the most serious crimes with a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment. Rape presents unique challenges for law enforcement as it often relies heavily on the conflicting testimonies of the victim and the accused, leading to difficulties in establishing the truth of the allegations. The text pointed out that the nature of rape poses a significant threat to women, as the vast majority of offenders are male. Consequently, some community groups have linked rape to broader societal attitudes about gender, complicating the understanding of the offence within a wider sexual and cultural context. Lawmakers have struggled to address these complexities, often resulting in a cautious approach to prosecutions due to the severe consequences of a rape conviction. Research from the Institute of Criminology at Victoria University of Wellington, released by Minister of Justice Mr McLay, aimed to identify legal changes that could alleviate the difficulties faced by rape victims within the criminal justice system. The study suggested reforms intended to lessen the trauma for victims when interacting with the police and during court proceedings, which could also encourage more victims to report incidents of rape, potentially leading to higher conviction rates. Efforts to improve the treatment of rape victims by police and support agencies have been acknowledged, as well as the need for police training to foster a more supportive environment during interviews. Despite this, the article indicated that concerns remain about frivolous allegations, influenced by factors such as alcohol and the complexities of consent in intimate relationships. One of the major discussions in the report revolves around the possibility of allowing wives to file rape charges against their husbands, which currently is not permitted. While this change addresses an inconsistency in the law—where partners can file charges but married individuals cannot—it raises concerns about potential misuse of the law, such as using accusations for blackmail or revenge. The challenges of proving a claim in situations where corroborative evidence is scarce are also highlighted. The article compares New Zealand's legal framework with reforms in some U.S. states and Australia, where offences related to sexual assault have been reorganised into various degrees of severity, removing a husband’s immunity from prosecution. This new approach has had mixed success, often still grappling with evidence requirements. In the context of marriage law reforms in New Zealand aimed at protecting potentially vulnerable parties, the discussion indicates a need for a similar approach to rape legislation. However, it emphasizes that issues of guilt and fault must still underpin rape cases, as the community seeks to prevent and adequately punish such offences. The proposed changes in the report call for thorough examination, though it acknowledges the difficulty in achieving consensus on a perfect legal framework.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand