Spy Scare Shows Risks (Press, 28 October 1982)

On 28 October 1982, concerns emerged in Washington regarding sensitive information shared with Britain that may have been passed on to Moscow by a spy. This situation highlighted the risks associated with the 1947 agreement under which the intelligence services of the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand routinely share intelligence gained through electronic intercepts. American intelligence sources reported worries that intercepted and decoded messages provided to Britain by the United States' National Security Agency (NSA) could have been compromised during the period from 1968 to 1977 due to a Soviet "mole" in the UK’s Government Communications Headquarters, which is analogous to the NSA. The seriousness of this potential breach has raised alarms among officials, as it might be the most significant security lapse since World War II. They fear this incident could have led Moscow to enhance its encryption methods while also supplying Western intelligence with misleading information. The New York Times reported on the ramifications of this development, noting the continued strain it places on the longstanding cooperation in electronic intelligence among the five English-speaking nations. Despite a number of previous incidents that have strained this intelligence-sharing relationship, cooperation has persisted. Historical accounts reveal that during the early 1960s, there were espionage cases involving the NSA. For instance, in 1963, two Americans associated with the NSA were discovered to be spies for the Soviets, and significant individuals involved in the agency faced troubling scenarios that exposed vulnerabilities within the organisation. One notable scandal involved Victor Hamilton, a former NSA code-breaker who defected to Moscow, revealing sensitive information to a Soviet newspaper. In the same timeframe, Army Sergeant Jack Dunlop, an NSA courier, took his own life upon learning he was under investigation for living beyond his financial means, which was attributed to selling critical documents to Soviet authorities for years. Additionally, two NSA analysts, Bernon Mitchell and William Martin, defected to the Soviet Union, publicly condemning the United States for spying on its allies. These incidents, although seen as very serious, garnered less media attention compared to the high-profile deflections of British intelligence officials like Guy Burgess, Donald McLean, and Harold “Kim” Philby during the 1950s and 60s. The exposure of Anthony Blunt in 1979 as part of this spy ring further strained the Anglo-American intelligence cooperation. In summary, the latest espionage concerns illustrate the fragile nature of Western intelligence sharing, with historical precedents suggesting that infiltration and betrayal have long posed risks to national security cooperation among the nations involved. The ongoing geopolitical tensions and potential for misinformation amplify the need for vigilance among these countries going forward.

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand