AI Chat Search Browse Media On This Day Map Quotations Timeline Research Free Datasets Remembered About Contact
☶ Go up a page

Tv Censorship (Press, 25 August 1982)

This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.

Summary: Tv Censorship (Press, 25 August 1982)

The controversy surrounding the censorship of the television serial "Brideshead Revisited" in New Zealand has sparked a debate over the priorities and decision-making of the country's censorship authorities. Letters published on 25 August 1982 express differing viewpoints on the issue. J.P. Stuart criticises the censors for their narrow-minded approach, highlighting the irony that children have access to various forms of media filled with violence and sexual innuendos, while adults are restricted from viewing certain films and television plays in full. Stuart questions the priorities of the New Zealand censorship system, asking whether it truly reflects the values of society. Alan Wilkinson's letter echoes Stuart's sentiments, but also expands the discussion by referencing the character complexities presented in Evelyn Waugh's "Brideshead Revisited," particularly pointing out how a devout woman can undermine her family through a lack of understanding. Wilkinson laments that certain scenes, particularly a lesbian kiss, are seen as inappropriate by censors, arguing this mindset exemplifies a lack of leadership and independence in Television New Zealand (TVNZ). He expresses frustration over the network’s programming choices and suggests that TVNZ has strayed from being a public asset. P. Wood’s letter presents a contrary perspective, defending the need for censorship in television broadcasts during family viewing hours. Wood argues that television and theatre serve different purposes, and that viewers should expect 'family' quality programming, particularly in the early and mid-evening timeslot. He, too, dismisses arguments from individuals like John Mortimer, claiming that the significance of any artistic work is diminished if it relies on sensationalised and explicit content. This discourse reveals a broader discomfort with how art and entertainment intersect with societal values and norms, and raises questions about the nature of censorship in New Zealand. The contrasting arguments highlight a divide between those advocating for artistic expression and those advocating for traditional family values in media consumption, ultimately posing critical questions about what is deemed acceptable for public viewing.

Important Information

The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact

Creative Commons Licence The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand

Publish Date:25th August 1982
URL:https://www.pridenz.com/paperspast_chp19820825_2_111_1.html