Whitehorn’s World Sex And The Single Policeman (Press, 17 August 1982)
This is a Generative AI summary of this newspaper article. It may contain errors or omissions. Please note that the language in the summary is reflective of the original article and the societal attitudes of the time in which it was written.
Summary: Whitehorn’s World Sex And The Single Policeman (Press, 17 August 1982)
The resignation of a Royal bodyguard due to a homosexual relationship raises concerns about the societal attitudes towards homosexuality and blackmail. The article draws a parallel to a previous incident involving an English journalist who was set up by the secret police in Eastern Europe. This journalist was blackmailed not for being homosexual, but for a different indiscretion. When he reported the matter to his newspaper, he was unfortunately sacked, which is indicative of the media's failure to support individuals at risk of blackmail. This situation has likely discouraged others, such as diplomats and salesmen, from revealing similar circumstances, perpetuating a cycle of secrecy. The author argues that societal insistence on hiding or rejecting homosexuality contributes directly to making individuals targets for blackmail. Public intolerance creates a situation where the risk associated with being caught in a homosexual act becomes a weapon for extortion. It is highlighted that if there were greater acceptance of homosexuality, attempted blackmail would be far less effective, illustrating that the foundation of the issue lies in societal norms. Examples are given to underline this point, such as male ballet dancers or Hollywood stars, where attempts at blackmail would be ineffective due to societal acceptance. The writer critiques the notion that achieving full societal tolerance is simple, comparing it to flipping a switch, and suggests that progress in these attitudes will take time. Moreover, the piece posits that a diverse set of experiences and backgrounds, including those of homosexuals, can be beneficial in various roles, particularly in areas requiring sharp insights and adaptability. It argues that individuals who have faced adversity, such as being marginalized, often possess valuable perspectives that can enhance their work. In terms of security, the article concludes that loyalty is paramount, and that homosexuals can be just as trustworthy as their heterosexual counterparts. A security system built on personal connections and loyalty, rather than prejudice, is essential. Anecdotes about the loyalty of homosexuals further illustrate this point; a police officer hinted that those of different sexual orientations could offer a different kind of loyalty, showcasing an unrecognized value within marginalized communities. The overall message advocates for greater acceptance and recognition of the contributions that diverse individuals can make within institutions.
Important Information
The text on this page is created, in the most part, using Generative AI and so may contain errors or omissions. It is supplied to you without guarantee or warranty of correctness. If you find an error or would like to make a content suggestion please get in contact
The text on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 New Zealand